Uae Israel Agreement Analysis
The head of the Israeli settler group Yesha Council, David Elhayani,[he], accused Mr. Netanyahu of “betraying” some of his most loyal supporters and of “deceiving half a million people in the region and hundreds of thousands of voters.” Oded Revivi [he], the mayor of Efrat, a settlement of more than 9,000 people south of Jerusalem, supported Netanyahu, arguing that “the Israeli agreement to defer the application of Israeli law in the Jewish settlements of Judea and Samaria was a fair price to pay,” adding that it could change the way settlements are viewed.  Beit El Settlement Mayor Shai Alon and Shomron Regional Council President Yossi Dagan also criticized the agreement.  A2: There may be more agreements, but I expect them to be like this one with countries that were not really at war with Israel. A senior UAE official recently told me that if Israel wanted peace, Israel could only be reached by an agreement with the Palestinians, which clearly would not normalize relations with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Instead, it is a collapse of Arab solidarity on the Palestinian issue, which has existed for three quarters of a century. Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi said the agreement would pave the way for peace agreements with other nations and welcomed the suspension of unilateral annexation. Yesh Atid`s chairman Yair Lapid welcomed the agreement as a “important step” for normalization with the UAE and said it showed mutual agreements are the path to be path to be path for Israel`s relations with other nations, instead of unilateral steps like annexation. The president of the Israeli Workers` Party, Amir Peretz, also shared this view and said that Israel`s development and security were in such agreements. He hoped for a similar agreement with the Palestinians.  In the region, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan and Oman have publicly welcomed the Abraham Agreement.
Saudi Arabia has said nothing, although analysts strongly speculate that this non-reaction is a sign that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman supports the deal, but that it is limited because his father, the king, opposes normalization with Israel. Iran, Qatar and Turkey have criticized the deal, with the latter threatening to withdraw their ambassador from Abu Dhabi. Civil society organizations across the region remain strongly opposed to normalizing relations with Israel. These include Gulf groups that have been particularly opposed to the Israeli-Emirati agreement. Nevertheless, there is certainly more with the agreement with the United Arab Emirates than the F-35s and good public relations for all concerned. There is a real hope that peace between Israel and an Arab country will not only resemble peace, but will also include reciprocal visits, trade, cooperation and diplomacy. There is hope that it will have the potential to finally open a door to a final agreement in the Middle East, which could be facilitated by the United States, but which will emerge here in the region itself. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson hailed the agreement as a path to peace in the Middle East and also welcomed the suspension of the annexation of territories in the West Bank. British Foreign Minister Dominic Raab and French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian expressed similar sentiments, with the former adding that it was time for direct dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians, while the latter said it created an opportunity to resume talks.  France and Germany saw the agreement as the hope of a two-state solution.  German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas called Israeli Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi to congratulate him.
 Even before normalization was announced on August 13, Netanyahu seemed to understand that the annexation would entail unjustified costs, but there were legitimate concerns about the impending elections in Israel or the United States.